Archive for category workforce management
The Importance of Taking Breaks
Posted by Rudolf Melik in Good Books and Articles, project workforce management, workforce management on January 13th, 2010
Here is an interesting article on the importance of taking breaks:
Some excerpts (although reading the entire article is definitely highly recommended):
Ever wonder why our best ideas come when we’re in the shower, driving, daydreaming, or sleeping?
When you look deeper into these ingeniously elegant solutions and brilliant flashes of insight you can see that they came at strange times and in random locations. They didn’t occur while actually working on the problem but after an intense, prolonged struggle with it followed by a break. A change of scene and time away seems to have played a part.
Most “creatives”—artists, musicians, writers, etc.—instinctively know that idea incubation involves seemingly unproductive times, but that those downtimes and timeouts are important ingredients of immensely productive and creative periods. But until fairly recently the how, when, and why of being kissed by the muse was something of a myth and mystery, explained only by serendipity.
New studies show that creative revelations tend to come when the mind is engaged in an activity unrelated to the issue at hand; pressure is not conducive to recombining knowledge in new and different ways, the defining mark of creativity.
While no one yet knows the exact process, there’s an important implication for all of us: putting pressure on ourselves to try and make our brains work harder, more intensely, or more quickly, may only slow down our ability to arrive at new insights. In other words, if you’re looking to engineer a breakthrough, it may only come through a break. Your brain needs the calm before its storm.
As one example, one of the best decisions we made at Tenrox was to shut the company down between Christmas and New Year’s. We do not schedule any internal or external project work, customer calls, visits or implementations during this time. Our professional services and support team is also asked to provide nothing more than essential services by a handful of people who are on call. We have done this for the last two years and it has been an incredible success. Our team returns to work well rested, creative, and fully reenergized. We very much encourage our team to take breaks and all their vacation time on a regular basis. Working hard without sufficient breaks and “off the grid” time leads to an unproductive uninspired team.
Would be great to hear your perspective and suggestions for taking breaks and how you apply this to your project teams.
A Sincere Apology
Posted by Rudolf Melik in Good Books and Articles, Human Resources for Project Managers, project management, project workforce management, workforce management on November 30th, 2009
In the fifteen years I have been with Tenrox I have seen two kinds of people managing businesses and running projects:
- Type 1: A person who apologizes for his or her own mistakes and accepts the mistakes of others
- Type 0: One who never says sorry, denies everything
Like most companies we have both types of people at Tenrox. Thankfully we have more type ones than zeros. Recently, there has been a huge surge in customer activity and we need everyone at Tenrox to be at the top of their game these days to try and serve every single one of our users.
A few days ago I had to talk to a type 0 project manager regarding some of the issues we have with his performance, the projects he manages, his overall approach to the challenges we have, and how important he is given the current resource crunch.
As usual, his automatic patterns kicked in. I got the “It is just your impression”, “but you don’t understand”, “no this is not true”, “you are wrong” … types of responses. This is a hard working person with good intentions and reasonable abilities. Unfortunately, his inability to take responsibility for any mistakes, wholeheartedly apologize for them, and his constant slippery denials virtually guarantee that he will always be nothing more than a second rate mediocre consultant or project manager, at best.
I sometimes call myself the Chief Mistake Officer at Tenrox followed by a list of my personal and professional mistakes just in the last twelve months to try and convey how important it is for everyone to take chances, innovate and get out of their comfort zone … but none of that is any good if we don’t have the capacity to sincerely apologize and to accept our mistakes.
Here is a very nice article on the power of apology: http://ccr.byu.edu/content/power-apology.
I hope more of our team members adopt this mindset.
The No Collar Workplace
Posted by Rudolf Melik in Automation and Collaboration, Outsourcing and Offshoring, flat world, project workforce management, workforce management on July 20th, 2009
Here is an interesting article that examines the types of personalities that can excel at working remotely or from a home office. These are the main takeaways:
Duff assumed it would be the quants, introverts, and reclusive types who would thrive in a virtual work situation. After all, they’re the ones who keep their heads burrowed in their cubicles. But it turns out it’s the extroverts — the office gabbers, the life of the break-room party — who thrive in the land of virtual work. Left on their own, these types of employees are the ones who work closely with clients, chum around with colleagues, and talk it up with bosses. They stay connected no matter where they are.
Shy, disorganized types are better kept in-house. The office environment is more forgiving of the scatterbrained; its structures help provide external reinforcement — as in your comrade popping his head into your office to remind you that you are late for the meeting (again). There’s also something to be said for the social interactions of an office environment. It doesn’t require much to keep up basic relationships when you are physically at work.
Duff also thought that mobile workers would tend to be seat-of-the-pants types. Again, the opposite turned out to be true. “Mobile workers are far more organized, personally, than their office-bound counterparts,” he says. “They have to be on top of their game the whole time.”
Based on our experiences with remote offices and employees I mostly agree with these findings. Here are a few of our own best practices for remote workers:
- The best remote workers are people you have worked with in a physical office. The longer you have worked with them the more likely it is for the remote relationship to be a successful one. Of course, the above criteria still applies. If this person is a disorganized introvert then going remote will only make matters worse.
- Do not hire someone who has always worked from the office as a first time remote worker. This is too much of an adjustment for anyone. A more gradual approach to going full remote (let’s say two days a week to start) is much more likely to succeed.
- Invest a lot of time in nurturing the remote relationship. We assume too much when we work with others, especially those we do not see. Taking the time to talk to them frequently, asking them how it’s going, and finding opportunities to connect with them virtually and in person goes a long way in making the relationship successful.
- It takes a village to go remote. You have to make sure that remote workers have the collaboration from everyone in the main office and access to the information they need to feel connected and get their work done. For example, if you are having Internet issues in the main office or any major pending announcements, your IT and HR personnel should immediately notify all remote workers of such events. After the fact is too late. Every event is an opportunity to build trust and enhance communication. Lack of such updates actually alienates people and hurts their trust in you and the organization they work for.
Faster is the New Fast: The Demand Grows for Project Workforce Management
Posted by Rudolf Melik in Globalization, workforce management on November 14th, 2007
Our friend, futurist Jim Carroll, has published a new book: Ready, Set, Done: How to Innovate When Faster is the New Fast. This book is chock-full of insights and observations, and skillfully organized into four sections: Velocity, Agility, Innovation, and Activity.
The section on Agility is particularly of interest to me, because it discusses skills: both the skills companies need to deploy to make work happen, and the skills people need to cultivate so that they can get their job done effectively.
A fascinating fact that Jim shared in his talk at our User Conference: 65% of today’s pre-school children will work in jobs and careers that do not yet exist. That means that the types of work we do in the next 20 years (which isn’t that long!) will change dramatically, and rapidly. Consider, already that for myself and my colleagues (all software guys) in my age bracket (early forties), the word "software" was unknown to us, up to early days of high school.
For individuals, they have to be open both to amazing specialization (I recommend the book’s chapter about "Manure Management" for an example), and constant change.
For companies, the pressure to be agile will be felt in the greater competition and faster times to market for each new innovation. And, the skills needed to develop more sophisticated products and services, and deliver them faster, will become more specialized. As we have discussed here before, companies have to be ready to outsource, attract the right skills, and practice project workforce management: the management of skilled project teams.
In the not-so-distant future that Jim Carroll describes, project workforce management is imperative. He writes:
In an era such as this, firms are faced with a future that requires a new form of human capital agility: the ability to deploy the right skills at the right time for the right purpose, regardless of where the skill might be required, or where the skill is sourced. At the same time, organizations are faced with an increasingly global talent base, a reality that demands new forms of collaboration, insightful project management, and deep insight into the effective utilization of those skills. The way to the future is clear: it’s no longer about managing time: it’s about successful skills deployment.
This book will inspire you to transform your company–and yourself–to be ready for the ever-accelerating rate of change in the flat world.
Webinar: Rise of the Project Workforce, October 18
Posted by Rudolf Melik in Globalization, project management, workforce management on October 10th, 2007
The Rise of the Project Workforce will be presented in a live webinar on October 18, 10:00 am Pacific Time, 1:00 pm Eastern Time.
Register for the webinar here.
You will learn the disciplines, processes, and tools required to operate in today’s economy from Rudolf Melik, author of the new book, The Rise of the Project Workforce: Management People and Projects in a Flat World.
In this webinar, I will explain how you can compete effectively by embracing and adopting flat world principles. We will talk about how Tenrox, as a company, has adapted to changing times over the last ten years.
We will talk about how your company can:
- Adjust to the changing economy using project-based solutions
- Analyze project performance in real-time
- Achieve optimal resource utilization levels
- Standardize processes and implement best practices
- Facilitate compliance and corporate governance
We will end with a 15 minute LIVE demo of Tenrox Project Workforce Management.
Jim Carroll on Project Workforce Management: Faster is the New Fast
Posted by Rudolf Melik in Enterprise 2.0, workforce management on October 2nd, 2007
Jim Carroll, author of What I Learned from Frogs in Texas, gave an entertaining and informative keynote at the Tenrox User Conference last week. One of the biggest take-aways was: be ready for change–more of it and at a faster pace than we can yet imagine.
Jim talked about how young people don’t only bring about rapid change, but since they have grown up in a world where change is a given, change is simply part of their lives. Whatever the next wave of change is going to be, they won’t just be early adopters–they will be rapid adapters, and they will adapt without even giving it much thought.
His title to the foreword of the book Rise of the Project Workforce, "Don’t mess with my powder, dude," refers to a snowboarder’s response to a job offer. What many of us would call a "regular job" just gets in the way of what is really important to young people’s lives. In fact, over half of people under 25 consider self-employment to be more secure than full-time employment.
We are already seeing what this new attitude is doing to the project workforce. First of all, it is making it more possible–there is a new batch of project workers for whom the "Hollywood Model" will fit like a glove. Second of all, it will force those of us ahead of this curve in experience, but behind in and adaptability (i.e., older) to take a hard look at the "innovation killers" we habitually put into place that could slow down the process of teams becoming more agile, flexible, and less constrained to the home office.
The Two Way Street: A Lesson for Project Workforce Managers
Posted by Rudolf Melik in workforce management on September 5th, 2007
BNET is a good source for insightful articles, news, and blogs. In particular, their blog "The You in Team" (which takes its name from the tired old adage, "There is no ‘I’ in ‘team’"), authored by Jeff Palfini, has frequent posts and lots of intriguing commentary about the nature of teams, teamwork, and how we all work together in a flat-world, "Workforce 2.0" environment.
Among many good posts, a recent favorite is: "A Two-Way Street Will Get You There and Back Quicker," about the value of enabling communication from the bottom up, as well as from the top down, within any team, large or small. For example, the post tells the story about how one CEO’s ability to listen to a junior engineer led to Sun’s development of the Java platform.
Not only is the "two-way street" a good idea on a philosophical level, but technology-enabled collaboration is simply making it an imperative. We see this everywhere, from "The Great Firewall of China"–where even one of the world’s most powerful governments is threatened by public communication and collaboration–to the ways corporations are optimizing their business practices around new collaboration tools.
As much as we talk, write and blog about global communication and collaboration, and the leveling of the playing field, the "two-way street" philosophy appears to be a difficult lesson for humans to learn. Yet it is clear that we are in the midst of making this fundamental shift in our ways of thinking and working together.
The Hollywood Model: A Project Workforce Approach
Posted by Rudolf Melik in workforce management on August 14th, 2007
The following article by Rudolf Melik has been published as an opinion piece on SandHill.com:
Hollywood producers must find it frustrating that an amateur YouTube video can attract a bigger audience than a studio blockbuster with a multi-million dollar budget. The same dynamic has taken over the software industry: a startup with a few people can compete for enterprise business with multi-billion-dollar mega vendors.
To stay competitive, mid-sized and large vendors can fight back against more nimble startups by adopting a “Project Workforce” approach. Software vendors can improve their agility and competitive edge by breaking down internal barriers and improving collaboration.
Zen and the Art of Project Workforce Management
Posted by Rudolf Melik in project management, workforce management on August 9th, 2007
In our globalized world, it is natural that the philosophies of our many world cultures will begin to influence how all of us work together. Here is an interesting interview in Projects at Work (login required) with George Pitagorsky, PMP, author of The Zen Approach to Project Management: Working from Your Center to Balance Expectations and Performance.
Pitagorsky, a project management veteran of some 40 years and a long-time practitioner of meditation and yoga, uses his personal and professional experiences to illustrate how Zen — a distinct school of Buddhism that de-emphasizes theoretical knowledge — can cut through complex issues to arrive at practical solutions.
Pitagorsky applies his experience to project management by suggesting methods for conflict resolution and avoidance, better planning, big-picture thinking, and "taking a breath and coming back to a reality check"–all excellent skills for better management of people and projects.
The first comment below this article on the Projects at Work site led us to discover Bob Tarne’s blog on Zen, Project Management, and Life. This is a well written blog with helpful information and a soothing, meditative tone. (Quite a contrast to the Angry Aussie, whom we blogged about the other day.)
As the world becomes more global, and as more of projects from Western-based companies are offshored to parts of the world where Eastern philosophies have a greater influence, will we arrive at a more balanced work culture? Or are these philosophies not ultimately compatible? Time will tell. Looking forward to your comments.
Resource Planning for the Small and Mid-Sized Service Organizations
Posted by Rudolf Melik in Business Process Management, workforce management on August 2nd, 2007
by Mike McRae, CMA, Vice President of Professional Services, Tenrox
If you’re like most SMB Professional Services Organizations (PSOs), you’ve probably got a good handle on things like utilization rates, average billing rate, profit per project, and revenue per resource. These metrics are widely used across all PSOs and are relatively easy to capture with any Professional Services software tool. The problem with only focusing on these metrics is that they only provide you with insight into how well you’ve done – past tense. They don’t provide you with any insight into how many resources you’ll need next month or next quarter, or more specifically, the number of Project Managers, Database Administrators, and Consultants you’ll need in the US, Europe, and Asia.
More importantly, these metrics will not alert you to upturns and downturns in the sales pipeline. This blind spot limits your ability to ramp up and threatens the new business you’ve just acquired.
Similarly, in a downtrend environment this reduces the amount of time you have to scramble before having to layoff quality personnel. In this regard the SMB organization is greatly disadvantaged over larger competitors. With formalized recruitment and on-boarding processes, larger organizations have an easier time attracting and training new talent and have a much greater ability to withstand lulls in the market, thus making them tougher to compete against.
With so much on the line, why do SMBs spend so little time on Resource Planning?
Read more on PSVillage.com, where Mike McRae is a featured author.


