<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TalentOnTarget &#187; project sampling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talentontarget.com/index.php/tag/project-sampling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talentontarget.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:48:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sampling as a workforce productivity measurement tool?</title>
		<link>http://www.talentontarget.com/index.php/2009/02/sampling-as-a-workforce-productivity-measurement-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talentontarget.com/index.php/2009/02/sampling-as-a-workforce-productivity-measurement-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rudolf Melik - Project Management Software Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[project workforce management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project sampling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workforce management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenrox.com/blogs/talentontarget/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I asked you which one is more accurate what would you say?
1) 4 weeks of approved timesheets showing what your project teams have been working on
or
2) you get up and walk around twice a day and only two days a week, at different times of the day and different days of the week, to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I asked you which one is more accurate what would you say?</p>
<p>1) 4 weeks of approved timesheets showing what your project teams have been working on</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>2) you get up and walk around twice a day and only two days a week, at different times of the day and different days of the week, to observe what randomly chosen&nbsp;people from different groups are working on. As much&nbsp;as possible try not to interrupt people or look too &#8220;suspicious&#8221; as this would change the results. What you are trying to do is observe without interference. Take notes and record your data each time. After 4 weeks you have some sample data.</p>
<p>At the end of the 4 week period, compare your sample measurements to the timesheets, and status reports you have for that same period.</p>
<p>I ran this expirement for 4 weeks by observing the following departments in <a href="http://www.tenrox.com" title="Tenrox project management software">our company</a>: sales, support, R&amp;D and service teams. The results were quite surprising. I will share the results with you in a future blog. In the mean time, I look forward to getting your feedback on which option you think is a more accurate measurement of what people are working on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talentontarget.com/index.php/2009/02/sampling-as-a-workforce-productivity-measurement-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
